BS-515
Lecture 14b

An Eye For An Eye

Sep 11 - 16, 23
12 13 14a 14b 14c 15 16 article videocam

Handout 23

“An Eye for an Eye” in the Old Testament

The law of equal retribution.

Question: Does the Old Testament set forth “an eye for an eye” as a way of life?

A. Where / how often does the expression “an eye for an eye” occur in the Old Testament?

It occurs a total of __ .

B. What is the general impression associated with the expression?

This expression has become a slogan meaning:

Jesus seems to be trying to correct that notion in the Sermon on the Mount (Matt 5:38–42):

The fact that Jesus mentions such examples as these give the impression that . . .

C. In general, does the OT call on people to be generous, merciful, and to overlook insults?

Yes, the Old Testament calls upon people to be generous, merciful, and to not(!) repay evil for evil. So no, “an eye for an eye” is not the Old Testament’s prescription for a way of life.

Rather, in general, the Old Testament commends the same basic manner of conduct as does the New Testament. Shock!

But this naturally raises the question:

D. When does the OT authorize “an eye for an eye”? This phrase occurs only 3x in the OT:

In these three passage, the injury is either deliberate, or the result of reckless, careless behavior. Other OT passages shed light on the question of when they would impose “an eye for an eye.”

E. Other Old Testament passages which shed light on the “eye for eye” principle:

In Sum:

In the case of accidental injury, or even death, the text does not require “an eye for an eye.”

Rather, compensation can be paid, even for death in the case of an ox-goring (because there was no intent). And for accidental death, a person can flee to a city of refuge (there will still be a trial).

F. Specific Conclusions Re: “an eye for an eye” in the Old Testament:

Lecture 14b
An Eye For An Eye